Metaphysics
|
 The Revelation Of Jesus Christ If you wish to read the ontological argument found in the Revelation, I can only apologise, for to read it in full you must purchase the book "Seven Eyes Open" (fifth edition). The Revelation (now interpreted) is most certainly "opened" with Godel's argument whereas it was "locked" beforehand. Godel's original argument is now discredited by an AI check that found an inconsistency in Godel's axioms. That one flawed axiom is presented altered in Scott's representation of the argument, which adds a conjunct to the definition of an "essence", predicating the essence to the "perfect being" instead. The same AI check has dismissed all representation of Godel's argument on grounds of "modal collapse" even when presented with the conjunct, yet the argument is resolved (and "perfectly" so) when Godel's axioms are preserved with Scott's conjunct; yet his initial assertions (Godel's assumptions) are found to be incorrect - there must needs be an alteration made to them. Those two assumptions are that positive properties are independent of the "accidental structure of the world" and that "all essences are equivalent". This is truthfully not so (works of the truly divine include those to correct the "accidental" - for instance, "sin" is carried only to the third and fourth generation and is no fault after) and the argument is applied consistently through modal collapse in the case of Jesus Christ's own Revelation, one which ultimately ended His life and did so with many miraculous proofs witnessed by His disciples to whom that logic was certainly out of reach (and not by some few centuries). The Revelation reveals a consistent ontological argument - one much similar to Godel's own - which does not suffer from the modal collapse due to or found from the presence of Scotts' conjunct added in Godel's definition of an essence. Not only is this correct ontological argumnent fairly presented, every Satanic corruption of it is revealed alongside it also; and that content is given in the dialectic logic which has been employed by the adversary since the fall in Eden. In fact, no modal collapse occurs across worlds in the argument of Revelation; a set of symmetries is derived in the structure of the Holy Trinity which agrees in whole with all of the arguments in the text as well as complete in the numbers found of calculations discerned from those symmetries; perserving "spaces" in years, months, days, hours etc. (even in furlongs). So, the argument is a "Revelation" for the Christ, who took it upon Himself to minister and even to die to show the efficacy of sharing that argument to His disciples (as the one Christ). He lastly prayed to be sanctified in the Father's truth (all His words are true), which includes that argument which was no doubt given Him first in the wilderness, and with which He took His first steps to fulfil all His works before His people in Israel. Christ was tempted of Satan in the wilderness, and He defended Himself only with scripture: there is no record of the Revelation being given Him before or after, yet Satan was summarily dismissed without Christ sharing any of that Revelation with him. Christ would not cast His pearls before such, and if you can accept it, you are not to remain His enemy, but as one to be properly edified. So, the book "Seven Eyes Open" (Fifth Edition) is a book for Christians, and not for making converts... I would first understand the Revelation and later ask whether the reading of that Revelation is to be kept to edify proper belief only, and for showing respect for God triune for His name to remain Holy (without any cause of blasphemy), or else to cast Christ's pearls before those that would only apply the enemy's devices in mockery. |
 |
|
