Giving Life To The Image

The only relevant verse(s) are:

Rev 13:14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
Rev 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. (KJV)

Now, to give life unto the image is, as stated in the book "Seven Eyes Open" (Fourth Edition) for a believer in the image system in a pool of churches to align their carnal (and rational) "soul" with the choice(s) of doctrine in that pool as if in resonance to the fallen state of those same churches. There is power there for that at least.

However, life is vigourous and self-sustaining.

A5 is a simple group: that is to state that it does not solve into a composition series of prime order cyclic factors. It will not unravel into a simpler system by such factoring. The body A5, then, appears as a closed object not entirely held in anyone's control within the understanding of those believers within. The result is that the collective body becomes "sacrosanct" or spiritually persistent: it becomes a form in and of itself somewhat, in the same way the sensual manifold may perpetuate life in a beast without reason, so continues the image riding that same scarlet beast system.

Now, the beast is only a system of works, but in the imagination of the heart it appears in that same resonance to be "something in and of itself" as if, for want of a closer term also found inappropriately applied: "Noumena".

Is that life for the image or life to the image?

So, the image is persistent and carries with it a state of doctrine already attained. (It has the power to "speak", that it should appear consistent.) As to killing all those that do not worship (resonate) with the beast, those for whom the system of A5 will not unravel into a composition series are left without any such answer: their words are not only to fall on deaf ears, they have no place in the system, for they cannot decompose it by those methods.

To be "killed" is to be excluded. No ability to decompose A5 to a solution that unravels into prime order cyclic groups is given. (It cannot be so done.)

So, where does the "life" creep in?

By using a model as of a manifold there is similarity, but not identity, despite there being a bijection. Were there any non-trivial normal subgroups of A5 there would, in the image system, be a sub-order or "clique" that could safely operate without that manifold, in a manner which would permit any conjugation in A5 to remain upon that subgroup, and then "cliques in cliques" are then to be permitted for sub-normal subgroups (sic) and the door is then wide open for fellowships to operate in themselves without that over-arching image system at all! The harlot system, in kind, cannot be made "pregnant", for it is actually male and is also the "son of perdition" to give it its other proper name.

Yet there are (this day) also many antichrist's and they all practice that harlotry through their mother.

2Th 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
2Th 2:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. (KJV)

S4 is a subgroup of S5, but not a normal one. There is no homomorphism to any group from S5 with S4 as a kernel. The "life" granted by that same insolubility that permits that uniqueness, or "soul" to carry from vote to vote in the state of doctrine that is accepted within, is separate to the sets within that form groups and operate as churches or "cliques" as above. That the image system is an overarching state of doctrine is all that is required, if it is to be found separate from the influence of individual member churches. Each church is unable to operate or effect change unless within that same manifold: for any vote or conjugation made by or in a "clique" would not then be a strictly internal operation, merely one that would affect some other church(es). Without the image in operation there is no agreement and unless that image operates, no changes may ever be made to what it "speaks". For it, in collection (collective), has that power to affect change and it alone, and cannot be so altered unless the image sits "as God" in the temple "of God" shewing itself to be "God."

The direction the image takes (what it "speaks"), is always taken under the vote by a single member church as false prophet, accepting the false doctrine of the "synagogue of Satan". Any member church can also vote by taking that office of false prophet - yet this is the image system as formed itself - the remaining churches work the decision as if "hell following after" with one mind as of the agreement of the image's ten kings. (Five pastors from five churches, one from a sixth supplying the false doctrine as for the vote or "mind" (the synagogue of Satan), and four "pastors" remain to practice the dialectic in a facilitated meeting in a supposedly "neutral" setting in the false prophet collective, i.e., as thesis, antithesis, synthesis (a 'covenant with "death"') and the chair - the pastor of the voting "church" sitting out in mimicry of the sabbath. (For more, see the book "Seven Eyes Open" (Fourth Edition).)

Return To Section Start

Return To Previous Page