None:
Polyps:
Strongs:

The Rapture Vaccine

God, will not deny Himself - we are assured of this. The cross is Christ's work of salvation to all, and were God unable to save an individual with the power of the cross, it would not be God's fault - merely that sin of the sinner. So then, God moves from grace to yet more grace in order to save mankind. Christ fulfilled the law so that by His death, grace could reign far more than the condemnation of the law, and more abundantly so. The rapture doctrine, however, declares the gospel insufficient - that it cannot save from the "mark of the beast". The "rapture doctrine" is then the vaccination provided to Christian faith to immunise the believer from that mark.

I did not use the term "evacuate" but immunize,.. for in being given the vaccination you are given the very mark it claims to be a "cure" for. (Though that "mark" is dead, a fiction.)

There was sufficiency in the law for salvation because Christ fulfilled it for us. The rapture, claims the cross insufficient, and in order to believe that the rapture is a necessary immunization from the mark, you have denied the salvation in the cross of Christ exists for it. In fact, the mark may well be repented of, and the gospel (your "immune system") may, quite adequately, fight off said mark if it is "healthy" and maintained!

There is no verse claiming that the mark is as such, rather I have a clear verse to the contrary,.. that God sent Christ to defeat the power of death - the same curse he loosed against sinners for disobedience. There is no second curse of a "second death" until after the judgement of God and all sinners are condemned to the "lake of fire" (the final inheritance of the ungodly). That, is the only second death, and it has no strength against the gospel before that final judgement.

Rev 20:6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years. (KJV)

By denying the cross, you are actually separating yourself from its salvation. In order for you to require "rapture" you are not saved from the mark of the beast - instead you deny the salvation in Christ. (Giving you said mark that you hope to be evacuated from.) They are mutually equivalent, that denial, and the mark which you believe exists.

There is no interruption to God's grace in Christ until after the judgement, which is unique and final.

1Th 4:18 Wherefore comfort one another with these words. (KJV)

So, as the mark of the beast is poorly interpreted (a "scratch" on the hand will heal if it is tended properly), that "mark" or "scratch" (as if engraved on the hand, but likened to a vaccine here, though again, it is not as such) is able to be repented of. The beast that forces the mark is the second beast, the "false prophet". Would you not rather receive the mark for a religious fault rather than a worldly one? (As from the first beast.)

Then if the mark is a religious fault, it can be repented of. Christ states:

Rev 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. (KJV)

That scarlet beast, wherewith God cages "every foul and detestable spirit" as the lake of fire (MYSTERY BABYLON) is the beast of which the mark is taken. Christians repent of it and exit already - they overcome it and its mark.

That scarlet beast as a cage (the lake of fire) also cages the false prophet and the beast (itself) in bed with it, for we are told:

Rev 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever. (KJV)

Yet that scarlet beast is the "little horn". It is a corporation or "little government" that self governs all its matters whilst attached to but separate from the first beast (the USA.) That religion is self governing, without the guidance of God but leavening all doctrine under the false prophet spirit instead. The "mark" is the reward for having one's doctrine and fellowship decided for oneself by a small minority assembled to vote on it, and for the whole collective (beast) to accept it blindly as with "one mind". That scratch is not given from above, but from the bottomless pit leavening all truth instead.

Simply leaving the beast through the "open door" to non-attendance is enough of a commandment from Christ to overcome the beast and its mark, if one have the faith to continue and approve oneself in Christ. (To maintain sound doctrine - as oil - as in the parable of the ten virgins.)

Now, the rapture is become the same unrighteousness it supposedly removes someone from (denying Christ). A "second death" must be an unforgivable sin. The only unforgivable sins are blasphemy of the holy spirit and final unbelief. Which of the two do we equate the mark with? It cannot be the latter if it is able to be overcome, and the former is forgivable if it not result in blasphemy continuously ongoing. In order to be forgiven that, one must repent before one is caught dead unrepentant (claiming oneself to be holy or guiltless.)

So, where does it state that repentance is not enough? There is a sin mentioned as such, that equates leaving Christ to persecute the church as with the authorities to then be one unforgivable, or impossible to return from to repentance. Can the mark be its equivalent?

Not if the rapture is to be believed: for the early church was not raptured.

Heb 6:4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
Heb 6:5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,
Heb 6:6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame. (KJV)

Does the rapture doctrine fulfill the "strong delusion"?

2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
2Th 2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. (KJV)

Damned - check. (to inherit a second death, or also the scarlet beast - the only religion remaining in hell)

Loved not the truth - check. (having denied the cross of Christ, a good enough reason for the above.)

Pleasure in unrighteousness - check. (preferred collective pleasantries with the like-minded rather than the difficult and separate truth, though that is only made difficult amongst those that hold the rapture doctrine.) They deny the virtue of Christ's cross and eternal intercession. The converse of that grace is "unrighteousness". That denial of Christ is all they take pleasure in, only discerning their own hearts will to escape the judgement they unknowingly declare themselves worthy of.

They have not received the "love of the truth", to understand that Jesus' cross will not fail any, anytime.

2Th 2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. (KJV)

So, the rapture has a very nasty side-effect, that those that adhere to it receive the inheritance of the scarlet beast - they are denied the salvation of Christ because they deny the cross of Christ. Collectively, the only approval one receives is like-minded fellowship. (There is no such approval from on-high.)


Continue To Next Page

Return To Section Start


'